Soleimani assassination and the danger of war: what socialists in the region have to say

Soleimani

Unlike the UK Stop the War group (uncritical apologists for the Iranian regime), the Alliance of Middle Eastern and North African Socialists, about whom we at Shiraz know next to nothing, are able to simultaneously condemn Trump’s reckless belligerence and  and the repression of democratic forces by Iran and other regional imperialist powers:

Oppose U.S. and Iran War by Showing Solidarity with Uprisings in the MENA Region

Jan 3, 2020

In the early morning of January 3,  at the order of U.S. president Donald Trump and without any authorization from the U.S. Congress,  U.S. airstrikes targeted a convoy near the Baghdad airport in Iraq and  killed Qassem Soleimani,  the commander of the Quds Force of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, and Abu Mahdi al-Mauhandis , top Iraqi militia commander/founder of Kataib Hezbollah militia  and at least  six others.   The U.S. Department of Defense stated that this attack was in response to Iranian-orchestrated attacks on U.S. bases in Iraq during the past few months, including  a December 27  attack on an Iraqi military base near Kirkuk which killed a U.S. contractor and wounded 4 U.S. soldiers.   There are currently 5300 U.S. troops in Iraq.    3000 more are on their way to the Middle East.   14,000 additional troops have been sent to the region since May 2019.

The idea of assassinating Qassem Soleimani was  publicly endorsed by a December 31 Wall Street Journal editorial statement which also called on Trump to attack Iranian militias in Syria.  (https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-iranians-escalate-in-baghdad-11577837753?mod=opinion_lead_pos3) Soleimani himself had challenged Trump in July 2019 by addressing him in a statement and saying that “I and the Quds force are your contenders.”  (https://www.radiozamaneh.com/482272?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+radiozamaneh%2Fcom+%28%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AF%DB%8C%D9%88+%D8%B2%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%87%29)

This action by the U.S.  follows  a December 31 assault  by thousands of  protesters mobilized and organized by pro-Iranian militias known as “al-Hashd al-Sha’bi” (also known as Popular Mobilization Forces) entering Baghdad’s heavily protected Green Zone and breaking into the U.S. embassy and burning the reception area,  in response to December 29  U.S. airstrikes on Iranian-backed Kataib Hezbollah militia bases on the Iraq and Syria border which  killed 25 and injured 50 militia members.

Earlier in June 2019,  Trump had  cancelled  a U.S. military assault on Iran which had aimed to respond to Iran’s shooting down a U.S. drone.  His administration decided not to respond to  Iran’s September 14 airstrikes on Saudi oil facilities and earlier  attacks on oil tankers in the  Gulf region attributed to Iran.    Trump himself had recently emphasized  that he was no longer interested in “regime change”  in Iran but  wanted to continue imposing the backbreaking sanctions on Iran to force the Iranian government  to  change its behavior.

However, what the latest ominous developments reveal is that regardless of what imperialist leaders might wish,  the compulsion of capitalist-imperialist powers to compete and  show their superiority has a logic of its own.

For the Iranian government,  Qassem Soleimani was the top commander, second important  leader after Ayatollah Khamenei, and architect of Iran’s bloody intervention in Syria as well as  the main  decision maker in Iraq.  Iran  has promised “harsh revenge.”  Its ally,  the Lebanese Hezbollah has issued a similar threat.   Israel has been engaged in low-intensity war with Iran for some time  by targeting Iranian bases in Syria and Iraq, and the Lebanese Hezbollah.    Israel  might strike  Iran itself if necessary.

The most worrisome aspect of these developments is that they might lead to catastrophic consequences and full-scale war.  That would in turn overshadow the wave of uprisings that have broken out in the Middle East and North Africa region in 2019,  from Sudan and Algeria to Iraq, Lebanon and Iran.  All of these uprisings  have opposed imperialism, authoritarianism, neoliberalism, poverty, corruption, religious fundamentalism and sectarianism.  Women have been active participants and often in the forefront. The participants are mostly working-class and unemployed youth. They are not content with the ouster of individual ruling figures but want to change the socioeconomic and political system. For all these reasons, the revolts could mark the beginning of a new progressive and revolutionary chapter for the region as a whole, although significant difficulties and challenges exist.

Authoritarian rulers and systems however, will not be easily pushed back.  In Iraq, a wave of  popular protests that began on October 2  in Baghdad and the Shi’a south have been brutally attacked by the Iranian-backed Iraqi government with support from Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and the Iranian sponsored Shi’a fundamentalist militia, al-Hashd al-Sha’bi which includes  the Kataib Hezbollah. Small but increasing expressions of support for the uprising have emerged in majority Sunni and Kurdish areas.    500 protesters have been killed and over 19,000 injured.

In Iran, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and other government forces brutally suppressed the nationwide popular protests that broke out on November 15 in opposition to a rise in the price of petroleum and  called for the overthrow of the Islamic Republic and an end to its military interventions in the region. According to Reuters,  at least 1500 protesters were killed in four days.  Between 8000 and 10,000 mostly young protesters have been arrested and most have not been heard from.   Many political prisoners,  including labor, feminist,  and oppressed minority activists languish in prison from previous protests.  These and revolutionary protesters in Iraq, Lebanon, Sudan and Algeria are the forces that socialists around the world need to reach out to and support.

The joy expressed by some at the death of the criminal reactionary Qassem Soleimani is understandable,  given his role in repressing revolutionary popular classes in Iran, Syria, Iraq and in expanding Iran’s militarism and influence in the region.  However,  his assassination represents nothing affirmative for the popular uprisings in Iraq and the region.

This U.S. imperialist action was not done to empower the people of Iraq.  On the contrary,  the result of this imperialist action could actually increase the risk of derailing the popular uprising in Iraq.  The threat is not necessarily that the current Iraqi protest movement would concentrate solely on opposing the United States after this assassination.  Up to now,  the majority of protesters have clearly opposed all foreign influences,  especially Iran and the USA.   However,  they might now be overwhelmed by another movement controlled and organized by pro-Iranian militias,  which uses this assassination to make the departure of Americans the only demand ,  while not challenging the current sectarian and crony capitalist system.  The risk is that the new U.S.-Iranian escalation will dictate all internal issues in Iraq and make  Iraq the site of a direct confrontation between the U.S. and Iran.

The popular uprisings in Iraq, Iran and Lebanon will all suffer while the rulers who have been condemned by the protesters try to instrumentalize the crisis in their effort to remain in power.

The reactions of Iraqi officials and political personalities close to Iran point in this direction.  Iraqi prime minister Adil Abdul-Mahdi who had earlier announced his upcoming resignation in face of the mass protests,  condemned the killings as a violation of the conditions of the U.S. military presence in Iraq and an act of aggression that breached Iraq’s sovereignty and would lead to war.  Iraqi Shi’a cleric, Moqtada al-Sadr on his side,  ordered his followers to be ready to defend Iraq,  while mourning the death of Soleimani.

In the face of all these developments,  opposition to U.S. imperialism’s air strikes and war threats against Iran and Iraq can only be effective when rooted in solidarity with the progressive and revolutionary forces in the Middle East and North African region and full opposition to all  the authoritarian governments and imperialists powers in the region.

We oppose all global and regional imperialists and authoritarians

Solidarity with the popular uprisings in the MENA region and elsewhere

Our destinies are linked

Alliance of Middle Eastern and North African Socialists

See also: https://allianceofmesocialists.org/solidarity-with-the-mena-2019-uprisings-statement-by-alliance-of-mena-socialists/

  • The Workers Liberty website carries statements from the Worker-communist Party of Iran Hekmatist (Official Line), Worker-communist Party of Iran Hekmatist, Organisation of the Communist Alternative in Iraq
  • H/t (for the Alliance of Middle Eastern and North African Socialists statement) : Coatesy

2 thoughts on “Soleimani assassination and the danger of war: what socialists in the region have to say

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s