The curdled hyperbole of Glyn Secker

One of the speakers at the Palestine Solidarity Campaign demo on 11 May was Glyn Secker, the secretary of Jewish Voice for Labour.

His speech has been widely condemned on social and other media (e.g. the Jewish Chronicle) for containing antisemitic tropes.

Superficially, there was nothing wrong with the main thrust of Secker′s speech — condemning the Jewish communal leadership for standing aside from the rise of the far right and the actions of the (hard-right) Israeli government (″When will they condemn the IDF slaughter of the unarmed at Gaza? When will they join the anti-fascist movement against Yaxley-Lennon aka Robinson?″)

Maybe it was that general message that the crowd heard when they applauded Secker. However, a closer reading of Secker′s speech is merited. Firstly, it was constructed around deliberate slippage. Secker said that the Zionist Federation as an entity ”embraces” the English Defence League. Not so! One very marginal individual in the Zionist Federation, Jonathan Hoffman and – at most – a handful of others, have linked up with the EDL: there is no evidence of a wider ″conspiracy″ between the two groups.

Secker′s speech displayed the standard Manichean world view of the kitsch left, on the conflict in Israel – Palestine as on other international issues. Here schematic connections are drawn between the (local) reactionary policies of the Israeli government, other events around the world, and global political trends (the shift to the right). In such a mindset, allegations of antisemitism in Labour have to be a right-wing conspiracy.

And so Secker′s observations were curdled with hyperbole, paranoia, lack of self-awareness and refusal to be affected by the evidence — in this case, of antisemitism in Labour.

In fact, Secker added to such evidence, saying Labour Friends of Israel were a ″fifth column″ in Labour! Does he not realise that phrase would be inescapably offensive to many Jewish people?

Such posturing is evidently much easier (and popular in PSC circles) than engaging with the increasing evidence of antisemitism from Labour members, going beyond the conspiracy theory and false flag posts being shared and liked on social media. Or empathising with someone like Luciana Berger, who experienced appalling antisemitism and was then accused of ″playing victim″ by Labour activists.

The most charitable thing that can be said of the milieu Secker moves in is that it is dangerously obtuse and crude in its political approach – just like his speech.

It should not be hard to critically assess evidence of antisemitism in and around Labour and the PSC, while at the same time criticising and opposing the actions of the Israeli government. But Secker didn’t even try.

  • This article also appears in the current issue of Solidarity


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s